The Impact of Implementing CCUS Cost on the Egyptian Cement Companies’ Financial Position | Case Study, an Egyptian Cement Company
Author(s)
Peter Boshra Rezkalla , Ismail Gomaa ,
Download Full PDF Pages: 52-68 | Views: 33 | Downloads: 11 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17464755
Abstract
The greenhouse gases (GHGs) are behind the symptoms of climate change (Ahmed I. Osman, 2023). CO2 occupies the largest portion of the GHGs by around 81% of the total GHG (Hong, 2022) Although the cement industry is one of the most important industries for being the major contributor to the Egyptian gross domestic product (GDP) and the creator of direct and indirect jobs, as it is the most indispensable material consumed. However, it also contributes a huge amount of the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions to the environment by around 750 kg CO2 / ton of cement produced (ElGhamrawi, 2023). Despite the other measures that are commonly used for CO2 emissions reduction over the previous decades (Adina Bosoaga, 2009). The carbon capturing and storing CCS technologies are considered the most effective technology, regardless of the high cost of the technologies and the uncertainty of the cost estimation, which are still barriers to the technology distribution (Kasper Storrs, 2023).
Methodology: Multiple methodological and analytical approaches are used to gather both qualitative and quantitative data. The qualitative approach includes analysing secondary data, conducting a case study of a leading cement firm in Egypt, and performing a semi-structured interview with one of the top managers of the case study company. For the quantitative approach, techno-economic assessment and cost-benefit analysis are employed to evaluate the impact of implementation costs on the firm's financial position. Multiple scenarios are proposed, and sensitivity analyses of variables such as carbon pricing, government support, and changes in capital structure are examined. These efforts encourage investment in such technologies and support the goal of reaching net-zero emissions in the industry.
Findings: The high capital expenditure (CapEx) and operational expenditure (OpEx) of the technologies affect the firms’ financial position negatively in terms of Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Net Present Value (NPV), Discounted PayBack Period (DPBP), and Real Option Approach (ROA). The moderating variable, the increase in the CO2 price, controls the relationship positively at a high carbon price of $70. This still needs the governmental support to raise the IRR above the weighted average cost of capital WACC. However, governmental support alone does not impact the relationship positively. But the change in the capital structure shows incrementally a positive impact on the financial position metrics.
Keywords
Cement industry, carbon emissions, CCUS cost, governmental support, CO2 prices, change in capital structure, and financial position.
References
A. R. PREST, R. T. (1966). COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS: A SURVEY. The American Economic Association, Surveys of Economic Theory Volume III, pp. 155-207.
A.J. Simon, N. B. (2011). Systems Analysis and Cost Estimates for Large Scale Capture of Carbon Dioxide from Air. Energy Procedia, 4, 2893–2900. doi:doi:1016/j.egypro.2011.02.196
Adam Hayes. (2025, August 08). Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF): Examples and Formulas. Retrieved from Investopedia: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/freecashflowfirm.asp
Adina Bosoaga, O. M. (2009). Co2 Capture technologies for cement industry. Energy Procedia, 133-140. doi:doi:10.1016/j-egypro.2009.01.020
Ahmed Elmezain, N. A.-M. (2024, November 5). Preliminary techno-economic assessment of the capability of an oil eld in Egypt for carbon dioxide geologic storage. Research Square. doi:DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5380300/v1
Ahmed I. Osman, L. C.-S. (2023, October 28). Cost, environmental impact, and resilience of renewable energy under a changing climate: a review. Environmental Chemistry letters, 21, 741-764. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01532-8
Ahmed M. Bukar, M. A. (2024). Technology readiness level assessment of carbon capture and storage technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 200. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114578.
Ahmed M. Moustafa, A. S. (2022). Reuse of Abandoned oil and gas wells for Power generation in Western Dessert and Gulf of Suez fields of Egypt. Energy report, 8(9), 1349-1360. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.07.067
Amira Tohamy Mohammed Eltayb. (2021, June). The role of government expenditure on environmental improvement A case study of Egyp. المجلة العلمية لقطاع كليات التجارة - جامعة الأزهر, 26(1), 1-49. doi:DOI: 10.21608/jsfc.2021.248604
Arno Zimmermann, M. K. (2017). CO2 Utilisation Today. Technische universtat. doi:DOI: 10.14279/depositonce-5806
Arshad Raza, R. G. (2019, December). Significant aspects of carbon capture and storage – A review. Petroleum, 5(4), 335-340. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2018.12.007
BCS Baliga, R. B. (2021). Integrated high impact innovation in sustainable energy technology-prefeasibility analysis for carbon capture, utilization and storage (subproject 2). ADB Energy sector group. India: Asian Development Bank. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/project-documents/52041/52041-003-tacr-en.pdf
Bhandari, S. B. (2009). Discounted payback period-some extensions. Journal of Business and Behavioral Sciences, 16(1), 28-38. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Shyam-Bhandari/publication/228645884_DISCOUNTED_PAYBACK_PERIOD-SOME_EXTENSIONS/links/556c9c8308aefcb861d7e3c5/DISCOUNTED-PAYBACK-PERIOD-SOME-EXTENSIONS.pdf
Brown, D. R. (1994, August). Levelized production cost: An Alternative Form of Discounted Cash flow Analysis. Cost Engineering, 36(8), 13-16. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Daryl-Brown-2/publication/255933212_Levelized_production_cost_An_alternative_form_of_discounted_cash_flow_analysis/links/5723849a08ae262228aa6e16/Levelized-production-cost-An-alternative-form-of-discounted-cash-flow-an
Cabrera, G. (2021). Essays on investment in Carbon Capture Technology: The Role of Markets, Competitors and Policy. A Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
CEMCAP. (2017). CEMCAP framework for comparative techno-economic analysis. European Union: SINTEF-ER.
Chen LIa, X. G. (2011, June 7). CO2 Emissions due to Cement Manufacture. Materials Science Forum, 685, 181-187. doi:doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.685.181
EGX. (2025, MAY 5). Execution of a New Transaction on Carbon Credits and Rebranding Market Name to Reflect Broader Sustainability Instruments “Egyptian Climate Exchange” (EGCX). Retrieved from THE EGYPTIAN EXCHANGE : https://www.egx.com.eg/en/NewsDetails.aspx?NewsID=269474
ElGhamrawi, S. (2023). Greening the Cement Industry in Egypt: Exploring Decarbonisation Policies for the Cement Industry. The American University in Cairo, The Public Policy and Administration Department. Egypt: AUC Knowledge Fountain.
Eli Bashevkin, T. C. (2024). Portfolio Insights: Carbon Capture in the Power Sector. U.S. department of Energy. Office of clean energy demonstration. Retrieved from https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2024-04/OCED_Portfolio_Insights_CC_part_i_FINAL.pdf
Enobong Hanson, C. N. (2025). Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technologies: Evaluating the effectiveness of advanced CCUS solutions for reducing CO2 emissions. Results in Surfaces and Interfaces, 18, 1-27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsurfi.2024.100381
EPA. (2016). SOCIAL COST OF CARBON. Environmental Protection Agency.
Hanne Lamberts‑Van Assche, T. C. (2021, June 11). Economic feasibility studies for Carbon Capture and Utilization technologies: a tutorial review. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 24, 467–491. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02128-6
Hanne Lamberts-Van Assche, T. C. (2022, February 12). Using Real Options Thinking to Value Investment Flexibility in Carbon Capture and Utilization Projects: A Review. Sustainability, 14(2098), 1-24. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042098
Hasan Muslemani, X. L. (2020, May 13). Business Models for Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage Technologies in the Steel Sector: A Qualitative Multi-Method Study. Processes, 8(576), 1-31. doi:doi:10.3390/pr8050576
Hong Wan Yun. (2022, March 19). A techno-economic review on carbon capture, utilisation and storage systems for achieving a net-zero CO2 emissions future. Carbon Capture Science & Technology, 3, 1-29. doi:DOI:10.1016/j.ccst.2022.100044
Hong, W. Y. (2022, March 19). A techno-economic review on carbon capture, utilisation and storage systems for achieving a net-zero CO2 emissions future. Carbon Capture Science & Technology, 3. doi:http://doi.org/10.1016/j-ccst.2022.100044
Islam, R., Sohel, R., Redzuan, F. R., & Hasan, F. (2024). Reusing Existing Oil and Gas Wells for CO2 Storage with Machine Learning Algorithm. The Offshore Technology Conference Asia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Malaysia: One Petro.
Jason Fernando. (2024, May 30). Internal Rate of Return (IRR): Formula and Examples. Retrieved from Investopedia: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/irr.asp
Johan Lilliestam, A. P. (2021, February). The effect of carbon pricing on technological change for full energy decarbonization: A review of empirical ex-post evidence. Wires climate change, 12(1), 1-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.681
John Frederick, T. ,.-Y. (2018, January). A review of optimization and decision-making models for the planning of Co2 capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) systems. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 13, 1-15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2017.10.001
Juanita Gallego Dávila, M. A. (2024, Jan 17). How to accelerate CCS deployment in the cement industry? assessing impact of uncertainties on the business case. SSRN. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4698109
Juliana Monteiro, S. R. (2022). CCUS scenarios for the cement industry: Is CO2 utilization feasible? Journal of CO2 Utilization, 61, 1-10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2022.102015
Kannapiran Arjunan. (2022). A New Method to Estimate NPV and IRR from the Capital Amortization Schedule and the Advantages of theNew Method. AUSTRALASIAN ACCOUNTING BUSINESS AND FINANCE JOURNAL (AAB&FJ), 16(6), 23-44. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v16i6.03
Kasper Storrs, I. L. (2023, March 26). A comprehensive framework for feasibility of CCUS deployment: A meta-review of literature on factors impacting CCUS deployment. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 125, 1-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2023.103878
Kenneth René Simonsen, D. S. (2024, MARCH). Challenges in CO2 transportation: Trends and perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 191, 1-14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.114149
Keshk, W. F., & E. E. Hekal, M. R. (2023, November). MITIGATION OF GREENHOUSE GASES EMISSIONS AND REDUCTION OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION IN CEMENT INDUSTRY IN EGYPT CASE STUDY: ARABIAN CEMENT PLANT. Journal of Environmental Sciences (JES), 52(4), 1-17. doi:10.21608/JES.2023.218805.1561
Lin Chen, ·. G. (2022, April 08). Strategies to achieve a carbon neutral society: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 20, 2277-2310. doi:doi.org/10.1007/S10311-022-01435-8
LYNX. (2023). Policy Brief on The Implications of CBAM on Egypt. Strategic Business Advisor (pp. 1-15). Egypt: LYNX.
M.M. Faruque Hasan, E. L. (2014). A Novel Framework for Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Sequestration, CCUS. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, 34, 98-107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63433-7.50011-0
Milla Vierikko. (2025). CARBON CAPTURE TECHNOLOGY OPTIONS AND THEIR FEASIBILITY FOR DIFFERENT EMITTERS. LUT School of Energy Systems, Environmental Technology. Lappeenranta–Lahti University of Technology LUT. doi:https://lutpub.lut.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/169044/Diplomityo_Vierikko_Milla.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Mvomo N. Edouard, C. J. (2023, October 1st). Comparative numerical study on the co-optimization of CO2 storage and utilization in EOR, EGR, and EWR: Implications for CCUS project development. Applied Energy, 347. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121448.
Nan Wang, K. A. (2021, November). What went wrong? Learning from three decades of carbon capture, utilization and sequestration (CCUS) pilot and demonstration projects. Energy Policy, 158. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112546
OGL. (2022). Carbon Capture, Usage and. Department for business energy & industrial strategy. ICC Business models. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/639c59bbd3bf7f7f95e05734/industrial-carbon-capture-business-model-summary-december-2022.pdf
Raghad Adam, B. O. (2023, October 12). echno-Economic Analysis of State-of-the-Art Carbon Capture Technologies and Their Applications: Scient Metric Review. Encyclopedia, 1270-1305. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3040092
Said, S. (2025, February 14). The Impact of Capital Structure on Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from Egypt. Open Access Library Journal, 12, 1-16. doi:DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1112839
Shuai Zhang, S. Z. (2020, August 4). Optimization-based approach for CO2 utilization in carbon capture, utilization and storage supply chain. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.106885
Siyuan Chen, J. L. (2022, October). A critical review on deployment planning and risk analysis of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) toward carbon neutrality. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 167. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112537
Stavins, R. N. (2020). The Future of US Carbon-Pricing Policy. The National Bureau of Economic Research.
Swati Negi, S. S. (2023, December). The Impact of Capital Structure on Firms Performance: a Systematic Review. International Journal of Scientific Development and Research (IJSDR), 8(12), 109-116. doi:IJSDR2312015
Tansu Galimova, M. R. (2022). Global demand analysis for carbon dioxide as raw material from key industrial sources and direct air capture to produce renewable electricity-based fuels and chemicals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 373, 1-19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133920
UN-Program. (2022, November 18). UN Climate Change Conference (UNFCCC COP 27). SHarm El Sheikh, Egypt: UN Environment program.
Weiwei Zhang, C. D. (2021). Policy incentives in carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) investment based on real options analysis. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 23, 1311–1326. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02025-y
Will Kenton. (2024, June 30). Discounted Payback Period: What It Is and How to Calculate It. Retrieved from Investopedia: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/discounted-payback-period.asp
Xiaocun Zhang, X. Z. (2021, July 2). Sustainable design of reinforced concrete structural members using embodied carbon emission and cost optimization. Journal of Building Engineering, 44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102940
Xing Yao, P. Z. (2018, June 15). Business model design for the carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS). Energy Policy, 121, 519-533. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.06.019
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.) (Vol. 6). Sage. Retrieved from https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/106905310/Artikel_Yustinus_Calvin_Gai_Mali-libre.pdf?1698189983=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DA_Book_Review_Case_Study_Research_and_Ap.pdf&Expires=1760452979&Signature=H7ed58Aj0o0S1RMW00Pk-WureOxz
Yu Lei, Q. Q. (2011, January). An inventory of primary air pollutants and CO2 emissions from cement production in China, 1990–2020. Atmospheric Environment, 45(1), 147-154. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.09.034
Cite this Article: