Human Rights in Serving Imprisonment Penalty in Vietnam
Author(s)
Doan Van Dai , Pham Thi Thuy ,
Download Full PDF Pages: 225-235 | Views: 636 | Downloads: 118 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4764444
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to study the current situation of ensuring human rights in the implementation of imprisonment penalty in Vietnam. The results show that Vietnamese law always attaches great importance to human rights for all prisoners. Inmates are always entitled to healthy activities, updated knowledge, labor training, sports and special amnesty to encourage prisoners to improve better
Keywords
Human rights, imprisonment penalty, Vietnam
References
i. Act Concerning the Execution of Prisons Sentences and Measures of Rehabilitation and Prevention Involving Deprivation of Liberty (Prison Act) of Germany, 1976 amended in 1989 and 1990.
ii. Alvin J. Bronstein, Jenni Grainsborough (2014), Using International Human Rights Laws and Standards for U.S. Prison Reform, Pace Law Review, Vol 24, p.811-824.
iii. American Bar Association, Criminal Justice Standards Committee, ABA Criminal Justice Standards on the Treatment of Prisoners, Third Edition Standard 23-1.1 (d), https://www.americanbar.org/groups/criminal_justice/ publications/criminal_justice_section_archive/crimjust_standards_treatmentpri soners/#23-1.1> accessed 6 August 2019.
iv. Andrew Coyle (2009), A Human Rights Approach to Prison Management: Handbook for Prison Staff (2nd edition), London: International Centre for Prison Studies, 168p. https://www.prisonstudies.org/sites/default/files/ resources/downloads/handbook_2nd_ed_eng_8.pdf
v. Andrew Coyle; Allison Campbell; Rodney Neufeld (2003), Capitalist Punishment: Prison Privatization & Human Rights. Atlanta: Clarity Press; London: Zed Books..
vi. Anne-Marie Cusac (2009), Cruel and Unusual: The Culture of Punishment in America, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press, 259p.
vii. Bronwyn Naylor (2014), Human Rights and Respect in Prisons: The Prisoners' Perspective. Law in Context, Vol 31, p.84-124, ISSN: 0811-5796.
viii. Correction and Conditional Release Act of Canada 1992 amended in 2019, s 88 (1) (a), s 88 (2), s 88 (3).
ix. Correctional Services Regulations of South Africa 2004 (as amended in 2012).
x. Elisa Toma (2011), The principle of equality of arms - part of the right to fair trial, Law Review, Vol 1 (3), The Union of Jurists of Romania and Universul Juridic Publishing House.
xi. European Council (2006), European Prision Rules. European Council publisher, p.45
xii. Gerard de Jonge (2002), Prionners’ (Human) rights and prisoners’ Litigation in the Netherlands, Journal of the Institute of Justice and International Studies, Institute of Justice and International Studies Central Missouri State University, Vol 1, p.23-33, ISSN: 1538-7917.
xiii. Gilles Chantraine; Dan Kaminski, Right in prison: Institutional police, juridical activism, democratic struggles, Champ pénal/Penal field, Séminaire Innovations Pénales, Online since 11 December 2008, connection on 28 December 2020. https://journals.openedition.org/ champpenal/7033
xiv. Grigority Dikov, Dovydas Vitkauskas (2012), Protecting the right to a fair trial under the European Convention on Human Rights. Council of Europe human rights handbooks, Strasbourg.
xv. Imprisonment Act of Czech Republic 1999.
xvi. John C. Mubangizi (2001), International Human Rights Protection for Prisoners: Which Way South Africa?, International Conference on ‘Thinking about Prisons - Theory and Practice‘, State University of New York, Cortland, October 2001.
xvii. John Reed (2003), Mental Health care in prisons. The British Journal of Psychiatry, Vol 182, Issue 4, April 2003, p.287-288.
xviii. José Luis Morín (2009), ‘Latino/as and U.S. Prisons: Trends and Challenges’ in Suzanne Oboler (Editor), Behind Bars - Latino/as and Prison in the United States, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
xix. Margo Schlanger, Regulating Segregation: The Contribution of the ABA Criminal Justice Standards on the Treatment of Prisoners, American Criminal Law Review Vol 47, no. 4 (2010): 1421-40, 1426-1427,.
xx. Penal Code of Peru 1991.
xxi. Penal Reform International (2008), A Compedium of Comparative Prison Legislation. First Editon. https://cdn.penalreform.org/wp- content/uploads/2013/06/man-2008-compendium-prison-legislation-en.pdf
xxii. Price v. Johnston 334 U.S. 266 (1948).
xxiii. Prison Act of Malawi 2015.
xxiv. Prisons Regulation of Malawi 2003.
xxv. Richard L.Lippke (2002), Towaard a Theory of Prisoners’ Rights, Ratio Juris, Vol.15, No.2, June 2002, (reprinted in J.Kleinig, Prisoners’ Rights, Ashgate, 2014). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-9337.00201.
xxvi. Sarah J. Summers (2007), Fair trial: The European Criminal Procedural Tradition and the European Court of Human Rights, Hart Publishing, August 2007, 200p.
xxvii. Sarah Joseph, Sarah Louise Joseph, Jenny Schultz và Melissa Castan (2004), The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Cases, Materials and Commentary, Second Edition, Oxford University Press, ISBN: 0-19- 925807-4.
xxviii. Susan Easton - Routledge (2011), Prisoners' Rights: Principles and Practice, Willan Routledge, 304p.
xxix. Susan Easton (2013), Protecting Prisoners: The Impact of International Human Rights Law on the Treatment of Prisoners in the United Kingdom, The Prison Journal, Vol 93 (4), p.1-18.
xxx. U.S Department of Justice; Investigation of Alabama’s State Prisons for Men, April 2, (2019), p1 <https://www.justice.gov/crt/case-document/file/1149971 > accessed 5 August 2019.
xxxi. United Nations, Human Rights (2006), Questions and Answers, New York and Genevar.
xxxii. World Health Organization (2018), A healthy diet; post on 23 October 2018 https://www.who.int/news-room/factsheets/detail/healthydiet?fbclid=IwAR0 wtc1uEp6clvZg6YVrnDuALjYksgqmXP1GyvQGgWJ8HItJBg8x5hFCdY, accessed 10/10/2019
Cite this Article: