Effect of Corporate Diversification on Capital Structure! Evidence from Listed Firms in Nairobi Security Exchange
Author(s)
Kibet Buigut , Neddy Cherotich Soi ,
Download Full PDF Pages: 39-47 | Views: 1045 | Downloads: 274 | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3445977
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of corporate diversification on capital structure. The study used longitudinal research design. Using a panel data model, the study estimated the effect of product and geographical diversification on the firm capital structure. A sample of 49 firms consistently trading in Nairobi security exchange between 2009 and 2014 was used. Using random and fixed effect, the study found that product diversification has no significant effect on capital structure, while geographic has a significant negative effect on capital structure. This infers that geographically diversified firms are using more but less risky debts than more product-diversified firms
Keywords
Capital Structure Corporate Diversification, Product Diversification Geographic Diversification
References
i. Achuti, M.K. (2012). Application of Diversification Strategies at Safaricom Limited, Kenya. Un-published MBA Project, University of Nairobi.
ii. Adamu, N., Zubairu, I.K, Ibrahim, Y.M. & Ibrahim, A.M. (2011). Evaluating the impact of Product Diversification on Financial Performance of Selected Nigerian Construction Firms. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 1(2), 91-114.
iii. Ajay, R. & Madhumathi, R. (2012). Impact of Diversification Strategy on the Capital Structure Decisions of Manufacturing Firms in India, International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 2(5), 421-426
iv. Alonso, E. J. (2003). Does diversification strategy matter in explaining capital structure? Some evidence from Spain. Applied Financial Economics Journal, 13, 427-430
v. Apostu, A. (2010). The Effects of Diversification Strategies on Capital Structure: An Empirical Study on European Companies. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
vi. Banerjee, R. & Dey, T. (2011). Can Corporate Diversification Promote Firm Value? A Survey. University of South Australia.
vii. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120
viii. Barton S.L., Hill N. C. & Sundaram S. (1989).An Empirical Test of Stakeholder Theory Predictions of Capital Structure. Financial Management, 18(1), 36-44
ix. Bhaduri, S.N. (2002). Determinants of corporate borrowing: some evidence from Indian corporate structure. Journal of Economics and Finance, 26, 200-216.
x. Bodnar, G.M., Tang, C. & Weintrop, J. (1997). Both Sides of Corporate Diversification: The Value Impacts of Geographical and Industrial Diversification. Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research
xi. Chakraborty, I. (2010). Capital Structure in an emerging stock market: the case of India. Research in International Business and Finance, 24, 214-295 29
xii. Chang, C., Lee, A.C. & Lee, C.F, (2008). Determinants of Capital Structure Choice: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 49, 197-213.
xiii. Chen, K. H. & Low, P.Y (2004).Diversification and Capital Structure: Some International Evidence. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 23, 55-71.
xiv. Chkir, I.E. & Cosset, J. (2001). Diversification strategy and capital structure of multinational corporations. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 11, 17–37.
xv. Dreyer, J. (2010). Capital Structure: profitability, earnings volatility and the profitability of financial distress. Un-published MBA Project, University of Pretoria.
xvi. Enow, A. B. (2010). A study of Capital structure in Extremely Different Environments. Unpublished MBA Thesis, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden
xvii. Grimes, D.A & Schulz, K. F. (2002). Descriptive studies: what they can do and cannot do. The Lancet, 359, 145-149
xviii. Guo, R. (2011).What drives firms to be more diversified?. Journal of Finance and Accountancy, Vol. 6. 1-10
xix. Harris, M. & Raviv, A. (1991). The Theory of Capital Structure. Journal of Finance, 46(1) 297-355.
xx. Higgins, R.C., & Schall, L.D, (1975). Corporate bankruptcy and conglomerate merger. Journal of Finance, 30(1), 93-113.
xxi. Hitt, M.A., Hoskisson, R.E. and Kim, H. (1997). International diversification: effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal 40(4): 767–798.
xxii. Jacquemin, A.P., & Berry, C.H. (1979). Entropy measure of diversification and corporate growth. Journal of Industrial Economics, 27, 359-369
xxiii. Jang, Y. (2012). Does International Corporate Diversification Improve Access to Capital? Working Paper, The Ohio State University.
xxiv. Jun, Z. (2010). Ownership structure and corporate diversification strategies of Chinese business groups. Management Research Review, 33(12), 1101 – 1112 30
xxv. Klein, P.G. & Lien, L.B. (2009). Diversification, Industry Structure, and Firm Strategy: An Organizational Economics Perspective. Advances in Strategic Management, 26, 289-312.
xxvi. Kochhar, R. (1996). Explaining firm capital structure: The role of agency theory vs. Transaction cost economics. Strategic Management Journal 17, 713-728
xxvii. Kraus, A. & Litzenberger, R.H. (1973). A State-Preference Model of Optimal Financial Leverage. The Journal of Finance, 28(4), 911- 922
xxviii. Lewellen, W.G. (1971). A Pure Financial Rationale for the Conglomerate Merger. The Journal of Finance, 26(2), 521-537
xxix. Luigi, P. & Sorin, V. (2009). A review of capital structure theories. Annals of University of Oradea, Economic Science Series, 18(3), 315-320
xxx. Markopoulou, M., & Papadopoulos, D. (2008). The capital structure of companies listed in the Greek stock exchange. EuroEconomica, 21(2), 73-89.
xxxi. Matsusaka, J.G. (2001). Corporate Diversification, Value Maximization, and organizationa Capabilities. Journal of Business, 74(3), 409-431.
xxxii. Michel, A., & Shaked, I. (1986). Multinational corporations vs. domestic corporations: Financial performance and characteristics. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3), 89-100.
Cite this Article: